शनिवार, 1 अक्तूबर 2022

Salient Features of Delhi Sultanate Historiography


There are various sources to get the knowledge of Sultanate Indian history. Among these, the first place belongs to historical works, most of which are written in Persian language. During this period the work of writing historiography took place on a large scale due to various reasons, whose main features are as follows.

1. Didactic nature of historiography

Didactic history is the history that gives moral education. The aim of Muslim historians in India was generally didactic, under which the ways of Allah are revealed to man. The ruler or sultan was just a means to fulfill a divine purpose. The purpose of recording the good and bad deeds of the rulers was to encourage, advise and warn the entire Muslim community. Minhaj, Amir Khusro, Barani all these Emphasized didactic history, which was considered a branch of ethics and a repository of moral teachings.

2.    Lack of Research and lack of criticism

The greatest feature of Sultanate Muslim historiography was its scholarly, impressionistic nature, which resulted in a realistic depiction of the past. For the early Indo - Muslim historians, history was what trusted reporters said and was contained in much older books. It was a history written by 'right' and not a description or account of the discovered knowledge of the past. It lacked any kind of research. Hardy writes about the Indo -Muslim historian : The historian is a scribe rather than a researcher and his work is not creation but communication. He can decorate and trim his material, but he does not transform it in his mind and does n't question it.

3.    Secondary role of history as a subject

Peter Hardy cautions us that given the comparative abundance of historical writings in the early phase of Islamic domination of India, we should not assume that history was considered an independent intellectual subject at that time. Its role in Muslim intellectual life was secondary. Barani placed history after the religious sciences and considered it their follower. It was the subject of fine education for the princes. But it was not given any place in the curriculum of madrasas and colleges.

4.    Not seeing the past as a process

Hardy also states that the concept of history as a process was not possible because it was too late to take its concrete form. According to the Muslim historians of medieval India, history was a series of mutually independent events given meaning by God. He saw the past in a personal context and in the form of biographies. The Muslim community was also not seen as an integrated component of historical study, nor was their interaction taken into account. Not only  God was held responsible for all events in history, but it was also said that it acts not through social forces or time consciousness but through individuals.

5.    Religious historiography

Hardy points out that Muslim historians, with Barani being an exception, did not view the past as a process of change or a story of something new being or becoming. The present follows the past, not the culmination of the past, in the view of most of them, history is a grand display of the divine law in which man was the only medium of expression. History was not a story of human action but action of divine. History was used to glorify Islam.

6.    Narrowness of subject area

Finally, the fact that the history-writing of the Sultanate period was very narrow in terms of subject area. Early Indo -Muslim historians placed great religious figures and rulers such as prophets, sultans, nobles and saints at the center of history. History has never shed light on the lives and conditions of the poor, low caste or oppressed common people. The vast majority of the population the Hindu community remained marginalized in such works and were referred to as ' Kafirs '. It also shows the absence of any challenge against the social structure.

Conclusion

Thus it is necessary for a student of medieval history to study the historiography of this period very carefully and critically. Then he will get valuable and abundant study material .

 

Reason for increase in Sultanate historiography

1.    Scholarly exodus from Central Asia due to Mongolian instability

2.    Establishment of many colleges in India

3.    stability of the empire

4.    Islamic tradition of historiography

5.    Use of paper

6.    Personal interest of rulers

7.    Persian being the official language

8.    Biographies and conversations of saints

कोई टिप्पणी नहीं:

एक टिप्पणी भेजें

History of Urdu Literature

  ·        Controversy regarding origin Scholars have opposing views regarding the origin of Urdu language. Dr. Mahmood Sherani does not a...